On 12 May 2026, the Thai Cabinet approved in principle two draft instruments removing nine business activities from the licensing requirements of the Foreign Business Act (FBA) B.E. 2542 (1999). Within 24 hours, the administration found itself in active damage control. Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul personally defended the decision to the press — apologising for the confusion caused by his own government’s announcement while adamantly maintaining that the substance of the reform was sound.
This friction illustrates the highly sensitive nature of foreign investment regulation in Thailand, where the political framing of a reform often triggers stronger reactions than the underlying legal text.
Update — 28 August 2026: The two Ministerial Regulations covering the service and brokerage exemptions discussed below have now been published in the Royal Gazette and entered into force. Read our analysis of the enacted FBL exemptions, including the exact related-company tests and links to the official regulations. The separate proposed Royal Decree concerning agricultural commodity futures has not been published and should not yet be treated as effective.
The Two Technical Instruments
The Draft Ministerial Regulation
This instrument proposes the removal of eight service categories from List 3 of the FBA (the list that ordinarily mandates a Foreign Business Licence):
- Telecommunications Services: Restricted strictly to Type 1 Licence operations (i.e., service provision without operating or owning physical network infrastructure).
- Treasury Centre Businesses: Operations managed under exchange control legislation.
- Intragroup Shared Services: Administrative management, human resources, and information technology services provided exclusively to affiliated group companies.
- Intragroup Debt Guarantees: Domestic financial guarantee services extended strictly to entities within the same corporate group.
- Internal Space Leasing: Leasing minor physical space within a company facility to install electronic financial service terminals (ATMs), vending machines, or automated service kiosks intended primarily for employee convenience.
- Petroleum Drilling Services: Specialised drilling infrastructure services provided exclusively to concession holders.
- Securities-Related Businesses: Activities already regulated and supervised under the Securities and Exchange Act.
- Specialised Derivatives Services: Agent, dealer, advisory, or fund management services for futures contracts where the underlying asset or variable sits outside the scope of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003).
The Draft Royal Decree
This instrument carves out a single, narrower commercial activity: agricultural commodity futures trading conducted through designated exchange centres where physical delivery of goods takes place at specified warehouses.
Regulatory note: This activity required a separate Royal Decree because agricultural futures trading is governed under a different structural provision of the FBA framework, distinguishing it from the standard List 3 service exemptions.
Unsure how the FBA changes affect your company?
Tell us briefly about your case and our Bangkok legal team will map out your options.
What Did Not Change: Retained Sectoral Oversight
The public backlash that necessitated immediate government intervention did not stem from media misinterpretation; it was triggered by the government’s own initial briefing. On 12 May, the Deputy Government Spokesperson framed the Cabinet decision in broad terms that implied a sweeping deregulation of restricted sectors.
In reality, removing a business activity from the FBA lists does not eliminate operational licensing requirements; it merely removes a secondary, administrative layer. The primary, sector-specific statutory clearances remain fully intact:
| Business Sector | Retained Regulatory Authority | Mandatory Compliance Framework |
|---|---|---|
| Telecommunications | National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC) | Telecommunications Business Act |
| Treasury Centres | Bank of Thailand (BOT) | Foreign Exchange Control Act |
| Securities & Derivatives | Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) | Securities and Exchange Act / Derivatives Act |
| Petroleum Drilling | Ministry of Energy | Petroleum Act |
Foreign companies incorporating in Thailand must still register their legal entity with the Department of Business Development (DBD). The FBL simply no longer stacks on top of the sector regulator’s existing enforcement process. As the DBD stated in its official press release, investors must secure permission from the supervising specialised agency exactly as before — they are merely spared a redundant application at the Ministry of Commerce.
Political Defensive: “Cutting Redundancy, Not Liberalising”
By 13 May, Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul was addressing cameras to correct the record, characterising the initial government communications as flawed and misleading.
Anutin’s core defence was anchored on efficiency and ease of doing business. He argued that where a foreign operator must already undergo rigorous security, financial, and operational vetting by a primary regulator — including specialised departments under the Ministry of Interior or the central bank — forcing a parallel application to the Ministry of Commerce serves no protective function.
By 14 May, amid ongoing public scrutiny, Anutin expressed open frustration at what he termed “unfair criticism”, emphasising that national security screenings, state oversight, and local business protections remain uncompromised. The administration’s defence rested on a single point: this is an administrative exercise to cut bureaucratic duplication, not an open-door policy for unregulated foreign investment.
The Dropped Provision: Software Development
The final version of the amendments presented to the Cabinet deliberately excluded software development.
An earlier working draft, circulated during a DBD public seminar in January 2026, had proposed a ten-category list that included software services under specific conditions. However, domestic tech agencies and industry bodies raised concerns regarding the competitive impact on Thailand’s domestic digital landscape. The provision was quietly excised prior to the Cabinet vote.
For foreign technology firms, the regulatory status quo persists: Board of Investment (BOI) promotion remains the only viable and reliable mechanism to secure 100% foreign ownership for software and digital platform operations. Broad, statutory liberalisation of the FBA’s digital services restrictions is not on the near-term legislative horizon.
The Final Scope and Conditions
The enacted text confirms that the shared administrative, HR and IT exemption and the domestic debt-guarantee exemption are limited by related-entity tests. These tests distinguish common shareholder or partner headcount, common holdings by capital value, direct cross-shareholdings and common management.
For shared services, the capital-based tests use thresholds of at least 25%. For domestic debt guarantees, the corresponding thresholds are at least 50%. The alternatives and their exact wording are explained in our article on the final Ministerial Regulations.
The exemptions remain activity-specific. Foreign entities serving unrelated third parties, providing intragroup services outside the stated categories or conducting activities outside the final wording may still require an FBL.
The Strategic Macro Outlook
The FBA has faced structural criticism from international chambers of commerce for more than two decades, primarily due to its sweeping restriction on foreign participation under the List 3 “other services” catch-all.
These amendments do not address those foundational critiques. They represent a pragmatic housekeeping exercise: streamlining licensing where specialised regulators are already entrenched and exempting captive, intra-group services that do not compete in the open domestic market. No wider revision of the FBA’s restricted schedules is currently under development.
Furthermore, while Thailand’s ongoing OECD accession candidacy has intensified high-level conversations around structural economic liberalisation, it has not accelerated any fundamental unwinding of the FBA’s protectionist architecture. This is further evidenced by concurrent joint enforcement campaigns by the DBD and the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) targeting illegal Thai nominee shareholding structures.
Current Legal Status
On 28 August 2026, Thailand published two Ministerial Regulations covering the service and brokerage or agency exemptions. Both entered into force upon publication. The official texts and a detailed explanation of the final scope are available in our analysis of the enacted FBL exemptions.
The separate draft Royal Decree concerning agricultural commodity futures was not included in Royal Gazette Part 51 ก. As of 30 August 2026, it should not be treated as effective unless and until the final instrument is published. The FBL regime continues to apply to activities outside the enacted exemptions.
Further Reading
- Thailand Expands FBL Exemptions for Regulated and Intragroup Services
- Foreign Business Licence (FBL) in Thailand: A 2026 Guide
- Thailand Foreign Business Act 2026: The Proposed Shift to Actual Control
- Thailand Set to Revise Foreign Business Act — Will Real Reform Follow?
- Thailand Tightens Nominee Controls: Mandatory In-Person Verification for Company Amendments
What This Means in Practice
The two Ministerial Regulations are now in force. Foreign-owned companies should map each activity against the final wording, retain all sector-specific approvals and document the applicable related-entity test. The change does not create a general exemption for services outside the listed categories. The separate agricultural-futures Royal Decree has not yet entered into force.
AIM Bangkok advises foreign companies on Thailand market entry, Foreign Business Act compliance, BOI applications, and corporate structuring. Contact us →
Sources: Royal Gazette — Brokerage or Agency Regulation, p. 29; Royal Gazette — Service Businesses Regulation (No. 5), p. 31; Department of Business Development Press Release No. 226, 14 May 2026; Thai Cabinet Meeting Summary, 12 May 2026; Royal Thai Government Clarification, 14 May 2026
